Ask a road engineer the cheapest time to fix a pothole and they'll tell you: about eighteen months before it exists. That's not a joke. It's the entire basis of asset management, and it's why the difference between a well-run road network and a crumbling one isn't the budget — it's the timing.

01 / The deterioration curve

Roads don't wear out evenly. A sealed road holds up well for most of its life, then falls apart fast at the end. Engineers describe it as a curve: roughly the first 75% of a road's condition decline happens over the first 40% of its life; the remaining decline happens in a rush. Intervene on the gentle slope and you're resealing. Wait until the steep bit and you're rebuilding.

Figure 01 · The cost of waiting

Same road, four intervention points.

StageWhat you seeTreatmentIndicative cost per m²
Year 0–5Nothing wrongNothing$0
Year 6–10Fine surface crackingCrack seal / reseal$8–$15
Year 11–14Potholes, edge break, patchesMill and resurface$40–$70
Year 15+Base failure, rutting, water ingressFull reconstruction$150–$300+

Indicative only — real costs depend on traffic, drainage and pavement type. The shape of the curve, not the exact numbers, is the point: each step up is roughly 4–5× the one before.

A chain of water-filled potholes along a highway shoulder
Water-filled potholes along the shoulder — water ingress is what turns a surface defect into a base failure.
A City of Greater Geelong road crew patching a pothole on a rural road
A Greater Geelong crew on a reactive patch. Necessary — but every one of these is a reseal that didn't happen three years earlier.

02 / Why councils get stuck at the expensive end

Because resealing a road that looks fine is politically invisible and rebuilding a road that's failed is politically visible. Nobody rings a councillor to complain a road was resealed too early. Everyone rings when a pothole eats a tyre. So the pressure — budget and political — pushes spending toward the roads already failing, which is exactly the most expensive place to spend it.

The result is a backlog that compounds. Every dollar spent on reconstruction is a dollar not spent on the cheap reseals that would have prevented the next reconstruction. Councils in this trap describe it as "chasing the failures" — and once you're in it, getting out costs more than staying in for a few more years, which is why most don't.

A network that's ahead

Preventive spending

  • 70–80% of budget on reseals and crack sealing
  • Roads treated before visible failure
  • Reconstruction rare and planned
  • Condition improves year on year at the same budget
A network that's behind

Reactive spending

  • Most of the budget goes to patching and rebuilds
  • Reseals deferred to fund emergencies
  • More roads tip into the expensive zone each year
  • Condition declines at the same budget

03 / The ward's exposure

The You Yangs Ward has three features that make this worse than average. First, it has a lot of rural sealed road per ratepayer — Anakie, Little River and Staughton Vale carry kilometres of road serving relatively few properties. Second, heavy vehicles: quarry trucks, airport freight and agricultural traffic load rural pavements far beyond what they were designed for. Third, growth: Lara West construction traffic is chewing through roads like Patullos and O'Hallorans years before the upgrades that were meant to accompany the estates.

I'm not going to name specific roads as "failing" without the engineering condition data to back it — that's council's asset register, and it should be public. But drive Forest Road South, the western end of Patullos, or the Anakie–Staughton Vale road and you can see the patch-on-patch pattern that says a road is in the steep part of the curve.

A rural road with a wide shoulder failure where the pavement has broken away from the edge
Shoulder failure on a narrow rural road. Heavy vehicles tracking the edge do this; once the base goes, it's a reconstruction.

04 / What I'd push for

The cheapest pothole is the one you never let form. Everything after that is paying interest.— David Greenwood OAM
Cost multiplier
~4–5× per stage deferred
The trap
Spending on failures starves prevention
The ask
Publish the condition register by ward